Rapport d'éclaireur

Faça parte do AoE4 MasterClub: https://vitorvicentin.com/aoe4-masterclub/ Torne-se Membro: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrAbkIFpoh8EZWof6y6DfmA/join Livepix: https://livepix.gg/vicentin

More AOE4 Casted FFAs - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2VswB1ebSNBMDp-orp9-tk3uyrpVmO9n My AOE4 FFAs - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2VswB1ebSNDKyLHhETzl2qbqxAxY1JGj

They have multiple units to choose from: Chevalier Confrere, Templar Brother, and Szlachta Cavalry. However, I'm never sure which to focus on massing for the best effect. With something like the Macedonians its pretty straightforward that I mass Ridarri and then Cataphracts to mix boths' affects. I guess I'm just not sure how to play with Templars.

This match up is really hard for me. It looks like you can't harras anything against Rus with Mongols. How would you suggest to play against Rus as mongols? For explanation: Rus can't really be tower rushed on gold. Kremlin safes a deer pack and a woodline. Wooden fortresses are clearly OP for me. They have so much HP like a stone tower and cost less resources, than a stone tower. Should I be gready into trade?

I just got my butt spit in by 3TC Song. I opened DA tower rush into feudal pressure as Japan, caught him building the BBQ and got a lot of vil kills but China build speed, i couldn't deny it going up. Felt like he instantly rebuilt all the vills I took out. I switched to FC once i saw he was just full turtling, got all the relics and sacred sites, and added 2 extra TCs of my own with Yorishiros in one. I had SS down to 4min but then he pushed with a million knights and handcannons and I just got clapped, felt like nothing I could do at that point. How do you guys punish greed from a civ that builds at light speed and their TCs shoot gunpowder? I had full map control, fully encircled his base, he did zero raiding, but i couldn't break through and he was unstoppable before the SS timer was done. I don't expect anyone to actually review the game tape but just in case my ign is exactly the same as my reddit username.

For fun i extracted the list of players with the most total games played (since season 1) on the 1v1 ladder. I won't give the list because i don't want players to feel stalked. But as a little game, try to guess the following (without cheating !), and i'll give answers in a little bit : how many games has the N°1 ? how many games do you need to be in top 10 most active ? what about top 100 ? what is the lowest (hidden) elo in top 10 ? what is the average (hidden) elo of top 100 ? Edit - here are the answsers : N°1 has over 13k games ! top 10 starts slightly above 9k games, top 100 just above 5k lowest elo in top 10 is 771 (9.6k games) average elo of top 100 is 1255 average elo of top 10 is 1287 (didn't ask but interesting to see it's not very different from the top 100)

Well, in my opinion, Mangudai should be a core unit for Mongols, it was already bad at ranked but very good in team games, with the recent changes it is not good a all anymore. I think something should be changed, maybe a remake? Maybe trade the gold cost for wood? New bonuses? Make it a normal horse archer and give it a tech for the hit while running? I realy don't know but, I really like the concept of the unit, it would be cool to turn it viable. Please, give your opinion.

Like compared to aoe2 Aoe4 is mostly focused on Multiplayer, Crucible are cool but the sp content will never keep people interested and stay in the long run Aoe2 have over 20 years of SP that we will never be able to follow, and the Ai is still very bad and makes poor decisions constantly, ie infinite lumber camps, build tons of War ships making them having no units on land, and runs away in a siege when they have numbers difference by just getting hit with towers Some some new missions similar to stronghold crusader would have been cool, I'm glad they are focusing the game on Multiplayer ​​

I’m working on a web app that analyzes Age of Empires IV matches using Gemini AI. The goal is to provide detailed match summaries, strategy breakdowns, player performance insights, build order analysis, and practical tips for improvement. The project is still in development, and I’d really appreciate any feedback, feature ideas, or suggestions from the AoE 4 community. Link: https://aoewhathappend.vercel.app/

(I'm Gold 3, if you're better this is unlikely to be relevant for you). Lots of build orders for China say to age up with the Clocktower castle age landmark. This makes sense to strong players, as they carefully micro their siege to get value out of the extra HP, and they have good scouting and map awareness skills. As a lower ELO player though, I'm not sure either are true for me. The Imperial Palace on the other hand is dead easy to use, provides immediate defensive value, and punishes a popular low elo play of sending a bunch of undefended vills to a resource node. A few horseman or lancers will get multiple villager kills.

I apologize for posting about this again but after verifying the polls I have to rectify some results. The top 5 of most versatile civs and vars are: First Place and Winner : China (without doubt) Second place : Byzantine (without doubt) Third place: Zhu (some doubt) Fourth place: KT and Japan (results are bit similar) Fifth place: Abbassid and Russia (The vote came late , I have to add them) To sum up the results are logic , maybe the more difficult civs to use are those that are the most versatile. Maybe players with higher level and elo than me could explain more these results. Please note that this is not about the most powerful civs but about versatility, a civ/var could be versatile but less powerful than another one. Having fun is also important as winning. Skill is still the most important factor ! I had to separate the polls because I can only put 6 options per thread. Links: Final (poll, not entirely accurate) https://www.reddit.com/r/aoe4/s/u93X4g4xNr Link part 1: https://www.reddit.com/r/aoe4/s/WIvkRa8xsj Link part 2 : https://www.reddit.com/r/aoe4/s/Ut3QYuKKxJ Link part 3: https://www.reddit.com/r/aoe4/s/v5q9tAwXVp

I've played this game for about a year now and rank low diamond/high platinum. Coming from Starcraft 2, AOE4 is definitely less micro intensive, and more focused on macro. The common adage that your whole army can be wiped out within 1-2 seconds in Starcraft 2 is not entirely wrong, especially for lower leagues. But at the pro level, this is due to a skill issue. This has nothing to do with overall difficulty of each civ, which is entirely a different topic. Here is my ranking of civs for 1. macro focus (top being most macro focused, bottom being the least): Byzantines (no, this isn't just due to passive resources/olive oil. I feel like decision making and building placement and versatility is crucial for this civ) Abbasid KT Chinese (macro is important, but micro is arguably just as important and if you screw up your micro esp with IOs, you're going to be left behind quite quickly. Like Byz, Chinese scales once they get into boom stages/later ages) Tughlaq (scales out of control once you let them get a few forts and bonuses associated) HRE / OOTD English (TC spam, building placement, etc) Jin Ottomans (decision making is important compared to other civs. Most S-ranked players think Ottomans are easy to play, but for beginners, it might not be so due to higher complexity, decision making i.e. 2TC vs FC vs military schools) HOL Golden Horde (this civ also scales well later on due to more efficient villager production, and once you get a few relics/ovoos down, it snowballs from there) Delhi (more a micro and map control focused civ, however there are some more complex macro fundamentals) Malians Ayyubid Mongols Rus (high trade house, proscouts, hunting cabins, and a few other nitty gritty mechanics make this slightly more macro focused than other micro focused civs) Zhu Xi Sengoku Jeanne D'Arc Japanese Macedonians French (very micro focused civ, feudal power spike and relatively simple macro dynamics) 2. Map control focus (top being the most map control focused, botto

If there is as much as a tiny puddle, A.I. will always build a giant navy, leaving no population room for actually useful units lol

Guy in ~600mmr 3v3 was bragging about his 1v1 rating. Looked him up, odd profile. Only played enough solo to get an mmr on aoe4 world and then switches to teams. He was undefeated in 9 solos this season with an avg time of 5min. Is this possible or something weird going on? https://aoe4world.com/players/23469935-zaollo

Приветствую всех любителей Age of Empires 4! Я комментатор и игрок в Age of Empires 4 и хочу создавать контент для любителей РТС игр, надеюсь вам будет интересно!